Proof That the Eath is 6,000 Years Old

In this post I will use passages from the Bible to prove the FACT, that the world is only 6,000 years old.

Genesis 5. These genealogies cover 10 generations, from Adam to Noah, and reveal that Noah died when the earth was 2006 years old.

Genesis 11:10-32. These genealogies cover 9 generations, from Shem (the son of Noah) to the death of Terah (Abraham’s dad). This genealogy gives the age of the earth at the death of Terah, who was the father of Abraham, as 2081.

Galatians 3:16,17 declares, Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. As proven in step 2, Abraham received the promise when the world was 2081 years old. Now, add the 430 years spoken of in Galatians 3:16,17 to 2081, and we discover the world was 2511 years old when the law (the Ten Commandments) was given.

Also read Exodus 12:40,41. Now the sojourning of the children of Israel, who dwelt in Egypt, was four hundred and thirty years. 41 And it came to pass at the end of the four hundred and thirty years, even the selfsame day it came to pass, that all the hosts of the LORD went out from the land of Egypt.

Exodus 12:40,41 reveals the sojourn of the children of Israel in Canaan, occurred during the lifetimes of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and in Egypt (see Exodus 6:16-20) spanned the lives of Levi, Kohath, Amram and Moses, lasting 430 years.

I Kings 6:1 states, And it came to pass in the four hundred and eightieth year after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt, in the fourth year of Solomon’s reign over Israel, in the month Zif, which is the second month, that he began to build the house of the LORD. This verse reveals it was 480 years from the time Israel came out of Egypt (the receiving of the ten commandments) until the fourth year of Solomon’s reign.

“We need to know that all things that called science, is not science. Sometimes it’s simply men’s opinions. We need to learn that all true science is in agreement with the Bible. The Bible is not a science book, but because the Bible contains all truth, all true science will be in agreement with the Bible.”

175 thoughts on “Proof That the Eath is 6,000 Years Old

    1. Kafata

      You’re pretty ignorant dude.
      Show me one time the Bible contradicts itself.

      What is stupid is the articles on this website, and the way they interpret the Bible.

      I mean, what kind of idiot proves something by using it? It’s a logical fallacy. You can’t use Bible verses to prove the Bible is true…

      Reply
  1. Pat Heinkel

    Excellent work, Tyson. Life on our planet is indeed 6000 years old and we must do our best to make sure the Lies of Evolution don’t persuade people to falsely think otherwise.

    Reply
    1. Truly Atheist

      Excellent work?!? all he’s done is read extracts from the bible and claimed it has cold hard facts.

      There is no reason why 99% of the bible shouldn’t be bullshit, and science that has always worked with us so far shows that it probably is.

      “The lies of Evolution”

      Evolution has huge amounts of evidence for it, but your precious bible and imaginary God has none, so surprise surprise anyone with a braincell can work out which of the two is lies.

      Reply
    2. Arrogant

      Ok, I am going to use the logic presented on this website, according to this website the earth is only six thousand years old. Well according to the bible there eight people that I can find that the bible actually list how long they lived. I know that it is possible these people all lived in the same period of time, but the bible doesn’t tell me what years they lived and died. So I am going to take it literally, that most of these people lived in separate periods of time since the bible didn’t specify. These eight people live a cumulative total of 7,260 years, so theoretically one or two of these people should still be alive. I know this sounds stupid right, so does the fact that you can possible think that we are only six thousand years old. Open your eyes look around, the bible is not meant to be taken word for freaking word, its a guide. Not your master, God gave us all free will do you think he would leave a book telling you what is or isn’t you have to figure that out for yourselves. The key to salvation is not in the words of a book its in the hearts of men.
      Below are the people and their age and what verse of the bible;
      Adam lived 930 years, and then he died. [Genesis 5:5]

      Seth lived 912 years, and then he died. [Genesis 5:8]

      Enosh lived 905 years, and then he died. [Genesis 5:11]

      Kenan lived 910 years, and then he died. [Genesis 5:14]

      Mahalalel lived 895 years, and then he died. [Genesis 5:17]

      Jared lived 962 years, and then he died. [Genesis 5:20]

      Methuselah lived 969 years, and then he died. [Genesis 5:27]

      Lamech lived 777 years, and then he died. [Genesis 5:31]

      Reply
      1. Steve

        I’d like to see some proof that the world isn’t billions of years old.(other than the bible tell us so) I mean sientific proof….of any kind…please.

        Reply
  2. Rhylan

    @ rev:

    “And the devil shall use the bible’s own words to justify his actions”

    That would actually explain a lot of Christians. Thanks :)

    Reply
  3. josh

    you are brainwashed. The bible was written by uneducated people who thought the earth was flat and the center of the universe. Then the books were put together men who wanted to push their beliefs on others. A lot of stuff was left out. The bible could very easily be classified as fiction. No one knew any better and they trusted self promoting fools. You are closed minded to actual science because you wonder how so many people could be wrong if they believe in the bible. If I told you I could fly without any equipment, would you believe me? NO!! But if 1000 people told you you might start to believe… what about 1 billion? Now, is it true or not?

    Reply
  4. eric

    ROFL you people kill me. hopefully your kids resent you and your BS badly enough so you will be the last generation that believes in this crap.

    keep voting for sarah palin- keep voting for an invisible man living in a cloud. Let me know how that works out for you.

    Reply
  5. Dro0

    Truth is, you sould really know what you’re talking about before you start publishing it. any person who actually researched that topic understands that there’s a long period of time between genesis 1:1 and genesis 1:2. Stupid people like you are part of the reason christians become atheist.

    Reply
  6. David

    You are NUTS! How do you explain the existance of dinosaur bones? If the Earth IS 6,000 years old how do you explain Meanderthal man? I didn’t see him mentioned in the Bible. Can you explain how rocks are found that are MILLIONS of years old?

    Reply
  7. A thoughtful atheist

    In a court of law, this type of evidence would be considered hearsay and conjecture. It is not verifiable. It lacks scientific veracity because there is no possible way to test the conjecture that “(g)od did it.”

    Good science is based on theory that can be proven through repeated experiments. While your faith is admirable, there is nothing in any books of the bible (dogma aside), that is incongruous with science.

    I suggest that if you have trouble reconciling science with faith, you could simply take science as proof of faith, as infinite complexity is an extraordinarily beautiful thing. Please, read your bible before making conjectures that have been thoroughly disproven.

    @Pat Heinkel: your racism and bigotry show that you have forgotten one of the most important lessons of the bible: “Love thy neighbor.” People have been living moral lives before Christianity. This is demonstrably proven through written texts that predate both the Old and New Testaments.

    Reply
  8. Pastor Jack Gould

    Atheist, you are not either thoughtful or right. Your plot is to deceive the masses to the truth. This video by fellow pastor Billy Crone shoots your ‘millions and billions of years of evolution’ theory out of the water, and definitively shows that life on Earth is 6000 years old.

    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPmttqW_yao

    Reply
    1. Droop

      That’s proof? You’re not serious, are you? The guy is a scam artist, and doesn’t even understand the science. You guys use “Darwin” and “evolution” interchangeably, when Darwin never mentioned “evolution” but rather “natural selection” a process we can see before our eyes every day.

      You believe in mythology, nothing more. Your mummery is no more relevant to scientific truth than Zeus and his thunderbolts.

      Reply
    2. jim

      anyone ever hear of a tadpole? (swims around and before ya know it, it’s walkin on land. or hopping. wonder if hopping is comparitive to walking.) there’s always the sperm guy swimmming around inside you know where. and suddenly (9 months suddenly), well, its still not walking is it? i still don’t get why a guy would knock up a virgin and then sacrifice his own son. sounds pretty evil to me.

      Reply
  9. P Bourgeois

    You’ve only repeated the mistakes made by Bishop James Ussher in the 1760’s….he also using the Bible….concluded the earth was 6000 years old….You can google it up….Nothing new…
    And long ago discredited by SCIENCE….

    Reply
  10. Rick

    The bible is not a book of science nor history. It is composed of mythology, this has been understood by early Christians, about 200 years ago the bible began to be interpreted literally. I have studied the Bible and it is filled with contradictions and the god it represents is a warmonger, look at the jews in Israel rationalizing genocide based on their a warmongering god. The bible has been a source for more immortality than any other book compiled.

    Reply
  11. Baywolfe

    Somebody really ought to tell the poor Chinese about this. They think their civilization is somewhere between 8,000 – 10,000 years old.

    Reply
  12. Indian Guy

    Wow, whoever you are, you are such a dumbshit. You can’t prove that the earth is 6,000 years using the bible, because the bible doesn’t know shit, how do you explain fucking carbon dating, leading to way more than 6,000 years ago? Charles Darwin proved evolution, and smart person (as in a real scientist) agrees that evolution is real… there’s no point in denying it just because your religion is a lie.

    Reply
  13. Gail

    Im sorry… does it actually even matter how old the earth is???
    What sort of relivancey does it have?

    What is the point of this debate?

    Reply
  14. Buddhika Gebrial

    What is this garbage? This is what you call “proof”? It is because people like you that the religious institution is so corrupted.

    Reply
  15. YoYoman

    You know what? maybe God has instructed Satan to put people like you here on Earth to test how dumb and ignorant people really are to actually believe that the Earth is only 6000 years old.

    Maybe the real demons are the ones believing the bible 100%.

    Reply
    1. Smarter than thou

      I thought only God could create life? So now you’re saying God lets Satan create men in order to temp others? Moron.

      Reply
  16. mtj

    You did not prove the world is 6000 years old in any way. You only showed that Bible claims the world is 6’000 years old.

    Reply
  17. Glenn Philips

    If you really belive this, go outside, get a life, maybe even study some sience, this is the most bogus cult shit I have ever heard, starting to sound like them scientology boys. Belive what you want as long as it makes you happy, but do not push this on other people and children, seen way to much of that and only leads to voilence and hate.

    Reply
  18. joynt

    This site is a joke right? As far as I can tell Pat Heinkel is just a troll.
    Please, for the love of….the flying spaghetti monster, tell me its a joke.

    Reply
  19. jeff

    So exactly how does quoting the Bible “prove” that the Earth is 6,000 years old? The Bible was written by man, not God. If man’s accounts are to be taken as fact just because it’s written in a really old book, then surely it’s a lot easier to believe modern man’s thinking a lot more?

    And why not include the possibility of science being real and coexisting with God? It’s interesting to watch Christians flame on science just because it’s man’s work. Christians should realize that they may as well be talking about an invisible alien-God that lives on Venus, it would sound like the same BS that atheists feel about God/Jesus to begin with.

    Let the Christian hate-train commence!

    Reply
  20. Satan

    I use the words of God against Him … I pervert the words of the bible with my gilded tongue … I also wrote every posting on this website to mislead God’s Lambs …

    Reply
  21. Chad

    Lol, how is this proof? You quote some verses from the book of fairy tales and you call that proof? This must be a joke.

    Reply
  22. Chris' Repost

    GENIUS! prove that this is all garbage..

    So your saying billions of unconverted idividuals fail? I think not my friend.. shinto, Taoists, and Bhuddists seeking the path for self enlightenment and unity with their surroundings are doing far better in this world than any christian would. They haven’t failed.. They, are in fact flourishing.

    Past has shown much slaughter over the conversion and strength to pass christianity. Also, conformity to these beliefs in the bible start the feeling of hatred, discontent feelings and actions, wars, and the prevention of modern diversity in a new technological age that we are living in. The world is changing and evolving in itself every day. The bible is not. It is just getting interpreted differently.

    1000 years ago the bible was taken word for word. Now any phrase is taken as an analogy and interpreted in an entirely different explaination for better understanding.

    Modern science is proving factual evidence of evolution with state of the art DNA sequencing methods, sedament traces within our very own earth, and fossils to name a few. With methods developed by man.

    When the bible was created, man could not even fathom the modern technological marvels that we have developed in our day of age. What could not be explained was thought to be magic. Heck.. We have computers! What would Jesus think about computers!

    I know for a fact that anything that cannot be explained with any factual evidence is theorized. Now and days we compute theories with physics, mathmatics, and experiments.

    And in the not so distance past of.. Lets say 1500 years ago their theories were made from elaborite stories to make themselves satisfied in their own lives for any unsolved question they had. In every religion, and it is dramaticcaly varied.

    tell me what a person would say 1500 years ago if you told them what that star in the sky was.

    And tell me what a person would say today, in our day and age what a star in the sky was.

    those are two very different answers. And one is very factual. And in the factual in this case is the answer from our day and age, and how did we find this answer ladies and gentlemen? I rest my case. Proof that the earth is 6000 years old, from a vary skewed book? Their isn’t any proof at all. Show me factual evidence, I want to see it right in front of my face. A Scientist can. The bible cannot.

    Christianity is one example for a human being that is not satisfied with themselves to look outward, but Bhuddism lets say, is an example of a human being that is not satisfued with themselves to look inward.

    Every answer we must face in life is found within ourselves. Not some riduculous bible. (The world’s most controversial book)

    Reply
  23. jeebus

    sure i’ll put my faith in something written by a bunch of uneducated goat herders that thought the earth was flat and the stars magical. that makes sense. i’m guessing the guy who wrote this garbage blog is making plenty of $$ off the faithful. suckers.

    Reply
  24. Jdogg

    What if the bible passages are in fact… i don’t know… not true? You quote scripture but offer nothing more. Please before you claim to have proof of the earths age, bring something a tad bit more credible.

    Reply
  25. Badrescher

    Thanks for the laugh, and I don’t just mean the post. The comments were pretty funny, too.

    Buy a dictionary and look up the words “proof”, “evidence”, “science”, “faith”, and “atheism” (which, btw, is not something one “believes in”).

    Reply
  26. P Bourgeois

    The Bible: 66 Fairy tales written by 40 different authors in three different languages, on three different continents over approximately 1600 years…

    Found this on the internet…saw it once on the HERB site…Had Enough Religious Bull….!

    Reply
  27. JoeTX

    Where is this “Eath” you speak of?

    I am only familiar with Earth.

    Maybe you should have gone to school instead of reading your magic storybook.

    Reply
  28. welldonesir

    I must say you are one of the best trolls I’ve ever seen. the stuff you say is so absurd that its hilarious. I mean the earth is clearly older than that, yet you defend the 6000 year thing to the death. epic troll.

    Reply
  29. Bill Maher

    You uneducated masses need to watch my documentary entitled “Religulous”. It clearly states that the world was NOT 6,000 years old, but much, much older. A scientist, who admits to being a Christian, tries to refute this statement using logic. Unfortunately it doesn’t work out.

    WATCH MY DOCUMENTARY AND BE ENLIGHTENED!

    Reply
  30. peni wang

    In this post I will use passages from the Bible to prove the FACT, that Tyson Bowers III is only 6,000 years old.

    Assholes 5. Tyson bowers is so old and fat that “god” asked him to move when he “created” the earth.

    Assholes 11:10-32. When ‘God’ made Tyson act his age, he died 100+ times.

    “We need to know how many “miracles of science” are keeping TB3 alive (and looking like a turtle”

    Reply
  31. Lulz

    Whoo hoo the earth is only 6000 years old because your little story book says so

    EVERY civilization in history had their own gods and their own stories to go along with them and they are now consigned to mythology and pretty soon this almighty bible of which you speak will be joining them.

    the true purpose of religion is to divide people and start wars

    Reply
  32. LMAO

    The Bible is just another man made book also, it’s not like god wrote it directly. I can’t believe how blindly people follow this. My number one things about religions is there commandments.

    THOU SHALT NOT KILL.
    But people slaughter each other because of their religion. That commandment is in every religion. All it talks about is loving each other. But yet in order to get this we have to kill each other first? Bullshit.

    Another good one is God loves each and every one of his children… If that was so he would have the ultimate forgiveness and lead us to the light no matter what we do, think, or say.

    The Bible = Man Made LIES

    Reply
  33. Patrick.....Ireland

    For the earth to be only 6000 years old all science has to be wrong. For example the explosion of the supernova SN1987A was witnessed by hundreds of astronomers. We know that it is 168,000 light years away from earth, so when we see the event happen we know it happened 168,000 years ago because thats how long the light takes to reach us. If you look up in the sky on a clear night you can see the Andromeda Galaxy with the naked eye. It is 2.4 million light years away…….. its simple look it up.
    Does it say anywhere in the bible that it is actually meant to be taken literally?

    Reply
  34. Bill

    The author of this post tries to convince us the world is 6,000 years old to prove that evolution is an invalid theory most likely and orthodox Christian doctrine can go hand in hand with science. Science is not man’s opinion, it is a systematic practice of deriving knowledge that has been evolved over hundreds of years. Science has no doctrine. The theories of science are constantly being refined and changed with new evidence and knowledge. The problem here is that while the author claims the bible is entirely true and true science will go hand in hand with the bible, the true science of the earth being 6,000 years old was proved absolutely incorrect hundreds of years ago with logical and reasonable thinking. The paradox presented is that the author backs up his biblical claim using only the bible. Scientific insight would be necessary to show that the 6,000 year old claim is true. There is however, no evidence of that, at all meaning science can not go hand in hand with Christianity. You can bash evolution theory all you want, but even if you win that debate, it doesn’t mean the Christian theory is any better because the evolution theory is always being refined and made better, whereas the Christian theory is static and everyday is proved more barbaric and deluded. Christianity is a crutch for man’s inability to cope with the problems of life and the things that make him uncomfortable.

    Reply
  35. Ruby

    *twitches* please tell me this website is all some sort of joke?!?!?!?! or my brain may just explode from the stupidness of these christian people. Seriously, this is not ‘proof’ these are just some paragraphs from a book. WTF!!!!! you belong in an mental asylum….

    Reply
  36. Talamasca

    yee haw

    [img]http://s271.photobucket.com/albums/jj135/Talamasca124/?action=view&current=jesus_dinosaur-1.jpg[/img]

    Reply
  37. lol

    Lol Religion is the biggest lie of them considering they can’t prove anything.
    also How do we tell truth from lies fact form fiction when we can manufacture both?

    Reply
  38. Chris Christie

    And I could take passages out of Lord of the Rings to prove how old the world is. You have no scientific evidence to prove the earth is only 6000 years old because words mean nothing without facts, eye witness accounts and physical evidence. You failed history, didn’t you?

    Reply
  39. jesus was a jew

    Your views are disgusting. You’re taking a novel’s content as scientific fact. Where the hell is your ACTUAL evidence?

    You guys are extremists and no better than muslim suicide bombers in my eyes.

    The world needs to be purged of those who think their kind is better than anyone elses because in the end, all the wars in the world are caused by facist cunts like yourselves.

    Now I’m not anti-religious, I believe that if religion can help people find inner peace and live a good life without harming others then it is a truely wonderful thing. However when people start preaching their beliefs and belittling other’s views without listening to both sides of the story, then that is short sighted and can only lead us back to the dark ages.

    I’m surprised you lot are even on the internet given that it’s such a sinful place full of pornography and *shock horror – FREE THOUGHT!!!1111one*

    Just do yourselves and the rest of us a favour. Stop preaching. No-one’s actually listening, no-one actually cares.

    – Jesus was a jew.

    Reply
  40. Non-existent

    Tyson, all you did was prove that the *bible* says that the earth is 6000 years old how do you know that the bible is the truth?

    Reply
  41. Danny

    there are loads of posts here that prove the bible is a load of shit. i have a query: is incest a sin? how did two people populate the entire earth with 7 billion people without any incestuous relationships? did adam and eve just have billions of children? and all in a few thousand years? i think we need to embrace change and learn to accept new ideas instead of dwelling in the past. there is no sense in following a rule book that served as an unofficial “law” thousands of years ago, making people behave in fear of burning in hell for eternity. religion as a whole is rediculous and is fear based, you believe it because it is what you are told to believe from an early age and grew up with that fear, or maybe just because you want some hope of an afterlife.

    Reply
  42. Danny

    lol i know… but loads of people have posted on here with very valid points about how the bible is not fact (definitely not all of it anyway), but that doesn’t mean they are gonna come to their senses, they just ignore the comments that prove them wrong.
    Seriously, if you “sin” you are not gonna burn in hell forever, so go out and have some fun, be adventurous (but friendly, don’t get drunk and start causing trouble, it’s not cool). Try smoking weed, maybe have sex with someone of the same gender, it’s all good lol.

    Reply
  43. Jrl

    If the stories in your book were made up then so is your conclusion. So you skipped a critical step: start by proving that the stories are true.

    Reply
  44. kevin

    You proved the bible _claimed_ the earth was 6000years old.

    I still cant understand how people can you put so much belief in a piece of text thats been mangled by mis-translation and had its content changed countless times before the invention of the gutenberg press

    Reply
  45. Me

    One of the most sensible ideas of the scientific method is called ‘Independent Verification’. Essentially, it means whatever ‘statements’ that you claim need to be mentioned in at least one other objective work (or can be experimentally verified).

    So, let’s try this with your 6000 yr old universe theory. If you ignore the bible, where else is it mentioned that the earth is 6000 yrs old?

    Reply
  46. anon

    There are Chinese and Indian histories that describe events which happen much longer than 6000 years ago. What makes their writings any less valid than those of the bible??

    Reply
  47. Jonathon

    mmm, so, what about all those inconvenient books of the bible that man left out? Especially the one that tells us all about Lilith, the first woman.

    Oh, and if the bible is so immutable, why do I have a 1950’s bible that reads differently than the 2000 bible I have? Especially when the changes were to broader definitions to justify greater persecution and hatred. Specifically, the only passage in the new testament that speaks about homosexuality, where the precise word “catamite” (boy prostitute, and the bible universally condemns prostitution) was changed to a more general “homosexual”.

    Reply
  48. sceptre

    I posted this elsewhere but it really should be here:
    Let’s talk facts:
    Take light. Light travels, it bounces off objects and enters the eye, printing an image on the retina at the back of the eye, which allows us to see. Light is not instantaneous. Like sound, it travels from its point of origin until it reaches our eyes. When light is produced by the sun, it is bounced off on the moon, and that allows is to see the moon. The light takes 1.3 seconds to reach us from the moon. So when we look at the moon, we see it as it was 1.3 seconds away. Light takes 8.3 minutes to reach us from the sun. So, when you look at the sun, you see it as it was 8.3 minutes away. Stars, on the other hand are much farther than the sun or the moon. It takes light years to reach us from other stars: Proxima Centauri, the closest star to the solar system is 4.2 light years away, it took light from that star 4.2 years to reach our eyes when we look up at it. It is 4.2 Light years away. I’m guessing by now you know where I’m going with this, but every time you look up at the sky at night and see stars, chances are you can spot stars whose light has taken more than 10000 years. You may spot the Andromeda galaxy, for instance, which is so far away that when you look at it, you see the light it emitted 2.5 million years ago. Look up at a night sky, and there you have it, proof that the world is older than 6000 years.
    The Bible does not deny any of this. It has all been proven, these are all facts.

    Reply
  49. Bible is fake

    I used to be a cristian, I belived it. Cristians r close minded people, it is very hard to convince them that there is no god. They trick there brain into beleiving it.The only way cristians become atheist is to think about it. Then they come to there senses.

    Reply
  50. noname

    First of all, this site is a joke, dont take it seriously, it is for entertainment purposes only.

    If anyone was really looking for any kind of proof coming from Christianity or the bible, all one has to do is seek it out and live it. Why would you expect your creator to throw proof in your face while what He wants most is for you to seek it out.

    I challenge you to try to find a model to live by that is more perfect than Christianity. It is perfection. It is the most difficult thing you will ever attempt to do. However, in order to do it with integrity, you have to know what is expected of you and why and understand the shift between the old and new testaments. A lot of these arguments on this thread are based on a lack of understanding and a desire to understand.

    To those that consider those that wrote the books of the bible as uneducated and ignorant. Most highly regarded scholars of past and present would very much disagree with you. Even if you dont believe it as the word of God, there is no denying that it is one of the most powerful, poetic and well written books in history. I have yet to read a book that comes close.

    Christianity is the reason for the fastest growing movement of peace and love in our world, no other religion can compare in works. It holds those that believe to a very high standard. You may not have ever met someone that really tries to live up to that standard. Everyone has sad stories of the hypocrisy of “christians” but this is no wonder due to the fact that Jesus told us “small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it”

    Reply
  51. TJ

    There is not one contradiction in the Bible. You may think so, but all can be explained, and there is not one. You may think there are contradictions, but that’s probably because you heard someone say it, but haven’t researched it. Jesus loves you bro, I promise.

    Reply
  52. thinkforyourself

    why do Christians think they have a monopoly on Love? sanctimonious dogmatic twats

    It is pointless arguing with people who think the world is 6000 year old. They call us Darwinists. Rather this than an ‘Ussherist’

    “lets add all the ages of folks in the Bible. That must be TRUE! forget mountains of evidence and experiment and common sence”

    Reply
  53. Anime ASSests

    This kind of BS is the reason why soooo many Christian Schools are not Accredited……..Religion is defined as the answers to all of life’s mysteries…Unless proven to be factual, then it is called science.

    Reply
  54. Your Face

    You say that because the bible says it, it must be true. You also say that science is sometimes just what men or women say. Do you have any intelligence whatsoever? The bible was written by homo sapiens. You know, those animals that you suggested just make stuff up.

    Your idiocy is laughable.

    Reply
  55. i am a christian

    to believe in God takes faith. but for me it would take too much faith to believe evolution. according to the big bang therory, in the begging there was nothing but energy and particles floating around. through random chance and infinite time they collided and made madder. now here is my question. where did the particles come from. as far as i can tell, they would have to be always there. so when it comes down to it you either believe in a God who loves you and a place after death, or random chance, infinite time, and particles that were always there.

    Reply
  56. Beherit

    Do you believe everything you read in books?

    What about factual books, on bees or something, just because it’s not relevant to religion is it false? Probably not…Just because the Bible says all this truth is it actually true? Probably not.

    Reply
  57. AOINEKO

    You can’t convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it’s based on a deep seated need to believe

    Reply
  58. John

    Do you wish to hear my counter argument for this entire article and all the supporting comments? Here we go…

    Go to your local museum. Now fuck off.

    Reply
  59. Oswald Did It

    There is no point in trying to convince fundamentalists that the earth is billions of years old- no matter what proof you offer, they will simply dismiss it as the “devils work”. What I’ve never understood though is that the exact science they use to measure the dates of the scrolls and pottery is the same science that pretty much says they’re all wrong. How can they accept science when it works for them but not when it disputes their beliefs? I mean one could argue that all of the dead sea scrolls were cleverly written a few hundred years ago, right- unless science proves otherwise. So why deny science it’s proper truth all the time fundies?

    Reply
  60. Alcatraz80

    So, what happened to the dinosaurs, home genus, homo hablicus, homo georgicas? Stands to reason they should still be hanging out with us if earth is only 6,000 years old. Regardless of your viewpoint of evolution, we can prove through fossils these critters existed (regardless of when). We can take KNOWN decay rates and prove that there are rocks on this earth 4.2 billion years old. Evolution is happening right in front of your face everyday. Are you saying that we are no more advanced than we were in the 1600’s (yes, this is evolution), or do you still believe the earth is flat and at the center of the universe? You seem (and look) to me to be a twisted, racist, ignorant man without much intuition or spiritual depth. Rest assured that whatever God there may be, is ashamed of you!

    Reply
  61. Pingback: 1st Annual Geocentrism Conference: Galileo was Wrong, Bible Is Right | ChristWire

  62. Infidel

    are you fucking retarded there tons of scientific evidence to prove that the earth isn’t 6000 years old and there is proof of human life that goes back for 30000 years and you base all you’re knowledge on THE BIBLE if in that fiction book would write that you’re the result of an frog having buttsex with an urangutan or that the world is flat or that every natural disaster happens because your god is angry on mankind and not because of nature religion hold’s the human race back it’s a primary cause of violence it support’s bigotry,intolerance etc.. and if you really belive the earth is 6000 years then you’re just wasting air and valuable resources of our beautiful
    4.5 billion years old earth.

    Much love and peace,
    Infidel

    Reply
  63. 11:11

    This website could have been better constructed, however even though this website states no other evidence than that in the bible, it doesnt eleminate that the earth is only 6000 years old, there is, in fact, a numerous amount of evidence that the bible is true. “Soo…”- there is no such thing as a fssil record, there are fossils in the dirt, they dont make a “record” of anything. athiests show just as much faith as christins.but please, if you can, be mature and respectful to others and their beliefs.

    Reply
  64. Pat Heinkel

    Every day billions of unconverted masses try to live their lives without the beacon of morality, and fail. If they all told me their silly ways were better than mine, I’d first laugh at them and then take pity…sharing a tract with them and perhaps giving them a cup of rice in the process, if they weren’t naughty, terror pagans trying to kill me that is.

    Reply
  65. John

    The Bible does not say anywhere that the earth was flat actually the exact opposite.

    There is not one shred of evidence that has been able to prove anything in the Bible wrong. Quite frankly few Archeologist tried to disapprove the Bible, failed, and eventually came to know Jesus Christ.

    I hope your not a reprobate.

    Repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand.

    Reply
  66. curious - again

    In response to your statement:

    1) Do you agree there are inconsistencies in the Bible (Yes/No)?

    * If your answer is “no”, then please explain hundreds of contradictory statements. Let’s pick one:

    ISA 14:21 Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.

    DEU 24:16 The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.

    * I really don’t see how can you possibly say “no”. So then, your answer is “yes”? Well, if it’s “yes”, then either:

    2.1) Bible is False
    2.2) You are right: Satan actually corrupted the Bible. If this terrifying possibility is true, how can you believe anything in it?

    Thanks for reply in advance,

    Curious x2.

    Reply
  67. J

    Your form of “education” makes people dumber.

    Considering all that modern science has given us, how can you honestly believe that the earth is only 6,000 years old? Ever had an X-Ray or MRI? Do you watch TV? Use the phone to call you family, or a computer to post your blog? The same principles that have brought these technologies to our society have also helped us look back to understand the past very well (carbon dating, astrophysics, etc).

    Unless you live in a cave and hunt and gather for your food, your believes come off as very hypocritical, AT BEST. Anybody with half a brain wouldn’t beat around the bush though . . . you’re a fucking moron.

    Stop ruining this country by trying to spread your ignorance.

    Reply
  68. Pat Heinkel

    Or maybe it is your mind that’s been clouded by the spirits of untruth, vile atheist. Your depraved little eyes are obviously blinded or you would have seen this video posted by Pastor Jack.

    This should shut your little blasphemous mouth and set your busy fingers to clasping together in prayer, as that’s the only way you’ll not burn forever for suggesting Satan would do anything good and the Bible is false.

    Watch this and open your heart, heathen.

    httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPmttqW_yao&eurl=http://tysonbowersiii.com/2009/02/proof-that-the-eath-is-6000-years-old/?replytocom=2033&feature=player_embedded

    Reply
  69. Pat Heinkel

    Son, why is your heart filled with so much vitriol and hate? Why can you not resist the temptation to tell lies or make such evil, untrue accusations against my character?

    I am deeply offended by your offenses, but due to the good that dwells with me, I still call you friend and embrace you as a young, inquisitive mind. Surely, you cannot articulate or properly explore the questions you have about your own nature and that’s just because you are young and naive.

    I’m here today, my friend, to tell you what’s wrong with you…so you may progress and grow.

    Your heart is filled with lies and hate because you embrace atheism. You put your faith into a false science because you have fear of the unknown. There is no scientific basis for atheism. Any true, academic mind who is not yet persuaded by the faith would consider themselves an agnostic at best.

    So you see, my friend, you are living a delusion. A lie. That’s why you try to cast what you’re feeling on the inside upon others around you. You accuse me of racism and bigotry, when I’m a man who has traveled the world far and wide, experiencing many different cultures and creed in efforts to yes, spread my faith, but to also share so much more with others.

    In your heart, you know you don’t have a 100% basis for believing in atheism. It has become a crutch for you, and it’s making your ability to think thoughtfully…rationally, a difficult task.

    Truly, today reflect upon why you chose a path of insecurity over a path of faith. Don’t get offended by my words, as the truth may hurt at first. Simply open your heart and reflect on these things. I have faith that in time, the convictions within you will open your mind and then…then…you will be able to fully express yourself, not project yourself, onto the character of others.

    Reply
  70. Orange

    Your taking verses way out of context then making accusations about the validity of the message of the entire book.

    Which version of the Bible are you quoting from anyway?
    Yes, satan has corrupted the message being received by many. Evident by the existence of these dumbed down politically correct (ironic) versions of the bible.

    Reply
  71. Marc

    If you’re taking individual verses completely out of context you can make the Bible say just about anything you want.

    Reply
  72. Mike

    Yeah, those two verses are way out of context. I’m one for keeping the Bible and science separate, seeing as how it has changed greatly throughout its lifetime and cannot be as accurate as the original. But the Isaiah verse is referring to the devil and his offspring while the Deuteronomy verse is merely stating what is a sin, what isn’t, and how to treat people like a good Christian. Do your homework before starting an argument 😉

    Reply
  73. John

    There is not one contradiction in the Bible at least the King James Version.
    Your example is a non-existing contradiction.

    If I were to try to make the Bible seem like is contradict that would be quite easy by your method, which many people use as an excuse.

    Basically your example can be compared to this example:

    I said im going to the store to get a jar of jelly.

    Then I Say 50 years later.

    I am not going to the store to get a jar of jelly.

    That is basically what your doing to scripture to make it seem it is contradictory.

    Just add hundreds of years rather than just 50…..

    Again the Bible does not have any contradictions (KJV).

    Say the Bible is contradictory to a Bible Scholar and see what he says.

    I am sure he will not agree.

    2 Peter 3:16-17
    As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

    Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.

    Repent and believe the gospel. The Lord wants to give you eternal life, and much more.

    Reply
  74. Orange

    If you weren’t blind and brainwashed you might do some research and find all the “principles” you tout are flawed. Astrophysics? They don’t understand how galaxy’s are formed (goes against the law of thermodynamics)and very little about dark matter that makes up most of the universe. Carbon dating? proved to be inaccurate.
    Because someone has a different faith than you, you tell them that they are ruining the country?
    *Oh no, different ideas than mine, must shut them out and mock them *
    you sound like a mindless little lemming

    Reply
  75. Jason

    My heart is filled with frustration because of people like you who deny reality for a delusion. While God may exist, it would be highly highly doubtful to be the overly humanized and very limited god that the bible portrays. Not that you could believe anything in the bible just based on the facts that it has been edited so many times by MEN both by changing the wording and choosing which pieces to include and which to exclude. How can you edit the word of god? You think you know better than him what to communicate to the flock?

    Secondly, why is there a new testament? Did god change his mind? If hes god, he knows everything for all time, so he knew the future when the old testament was written. Why wouldnt he just create a book that was universal and timeless?

    Why is your book right and other people’s wrong?

    When you realize why you dismiss other people’s gods, you will realize why I dismiss yours.

    I dont say these things with hate. I would love nothing better than for there to be a proven god and guaranteed existence of an after. But, if there is one, its nothing like that book paints it. And there is not 1 thing, not 1 simple tiny example of the supernatural that we can point to. Not 1.

    Reply
  76. Chris Weir

    “There is no scientific basis for atheism.”

    There is no scientific basis for Christianity.

    Reply
  77. Jason

    Morals are strictly the purview of religion and definitely not Christianity. Morals existed long before organized religion.

    And nothing you posted shows anything that that Earth is 6000 y/o. The idea is ridiculous. You want a simple way to show how false it is. Trace geneology and try to get as many people as we have today in 6000 years. We arent rabbits no matter how much we try.

    If we are to believe your ‘theory’ then you would have to conclude that god put all the clues to an older past, such as dinosaurs and neaderthals and cave drawings, and all that stuff here just to mislead you. So basically your god is lying to you or trying to trick you. Now how does that make any sense?

    Reply
  78. Chris

    So your saying billions of unconverted idividuals fail? I think not my friend.. shinto, Taoists, and Bhuddists seeking the path for self enlightenment and unity with their surroundings are doing far better in this world than any christian would. They haven’t failed.. They, are in fact flourishing.

    Past has shown much slaughter over the conversion and strength to pass christianity. Also, conformity to these beliefs in the bible start the feeling of hatred, discontent feelings and actions, wars, and the prevention of modern diversity in a new technological age that we are living in. The world is changing and evolving in itself every day. The bible is not. It is just getting interpreted differently.

    1000 years ago the bible was taken word for word. Now any phrase is taken as an analogy and interpreted in an entirely different explaination for better understanding.

    Modern science is proving factual evidence of evolution with state of the art DNA sequencing methods, sedament traces within our very own earth, and fossils to name a few. With methods developed by man.

    When the bible was created, man could not even fathom the modern technological marvels that we have developed in our day of age. What could not be explained was thought to be magic. Heck.. We have computers! What would Jesus think about computers!

    I know for a fact that anything that cannot be explained with any factual evidence is theorized. Now and days we compute theories with physics, mathmatics, and experiments.

    And in the not so distance past of.. Lets say 1500 years ago their theories were made from elaborite stories to make themselves satisfied in their own lives for any unsolved question they had. In every religion, and it is dramaticcaly varied.

    tell me what a person would say 1500 years ago if you told them what that star in the sky was.

    And tell me what a person would say today, in our day and age what a star in the sky was.

    those are two very different answers. And one is very factual. And in the factual in this case is the answer from our day and age, and how did we find this answer ladies and gentlemen? I rest my case. Proof that the earth is 6000 years old, from a vary skewed book? Their isn’t any proof at all. Show me factual evidence, I want to see it right in front of my face. A Scientist can. The bible cannot.

    Christianity is one example for a human being that is not satisfied with themselves to look outward, but Bhuddism lets say, is an example of a human being that is not satisfued with themselves to look inward.

    Every answer we must face in life is found within ourselves. Not some riduculous bible. (The world’s most controversial book)

    Reply
  79. Jason

    It does. It makes me pray, Lord please save me from you followers. They are a blind flock that follows mindlessly. They can be so easily mislead, in your name, to commit the most heinous of acts even in direct contradiction to your teachings.

    Reply
  80. Come on

    You’re kidding, right?

    A book written by a few people 2000 years ago, with some input from a guy high up a mountain is proof that the earth is 6000 years old?

    Oh my god, how can you possibly believe that is true? How about maybe the bible is just written by a bunch of people with too much time on their hands. Is that even possible? If you think its the inspired word of god, then that’s your right, but I would never rely on your advise on anything professional (what, have faith, a tornado won’t take down your house if you pray hard enough?)

    Jeez

    Reply
  81. bill

    you might not like carbon dating, but have you ever heard of uranium or potassium dating? they both have been proven to be accurate

    Reply
  82. Mike

    Carbon dating is accurate to an extent (up to 50,000 years I believe…). But there are anomalies which means you have to be fairly educated about the history of the objects environment. Either way, there’s still no proof that the earth is 6,000 years old. The Bible has be altered so many times that it’s unreliable, not to mention it doesn’t actually prove anything dealing with science (spirituality is a different story).

    Reply
  83. Mike

    Wow. That video is completely wrong. The theory of evolution is about how life changes and adapts into new forms of life; it’s not about the origin of life, the earth, or the cosmos. Not to mention, I don’t really see how evolution contradicts God. Wouldn’t an all knowing being create a highly intelligent and efficient process rather than having to labor over creating life in every form that it exists?

    Reply
  84. Grayson

    Your Christian drivel is no match for our secular logic. Give it up, we have the fossils. I’m not saying I hate Christians. My girlfriend’s a Christian. But I can’t stand people who clamp their hands over their ears and spew bible verses to counter an argument.

    Reply
  85. Chris

    Actually I am not making any money off the faithful.. I just get mad at stupid people that quote things from the bible stating that everything is fact. He is in fact, a stupid uneducated person.

    What I still don’t get are Devout Christian Scientists.. That really is the most confusing subject matter I am trying to figure out.. LOL

    Reply
  86. Me

    I am amazed that someone who touts the word of God as truth could see an entire race of people as monkeys. It is kind of contradictory isn’t it?

    Black people are monkeys – they evolved from monkeys to become people; however, white people are the children of god and thus didn’t require evolution (seeing as how it appearently happened in the span of 6000 years)

    Black people are people – we are all the children of God, and thus anyone who calls them monkeys are ignorant bafoons who would dispell hatred for their brothers.

    I am an atheist and I have read the bible, to me doing such a thing as making such racist comments go far against the so called word of God. Man is truly a flawed creation, I can only hope that those who are more flawed than others don’t know how to procreate so their seed (and their hatred) dies with them.

    Reply
  87. Colin

    I killed myself laughing here. Wow. Funny funny stuff man!!
    I praise your ability to sound like some of the nutjobs who believe this crap.
    I loved your opening statement “In this post I will use passages from the Bible to prove the FACT, that the world is only 6,000 years old.” Soo funny! As if proofs exist outside of math anyway! And I’m so glad you didn’t try to disprove any actual scientific theories, just quoted the bible.
    Brilliant.
    Your bit explaining what “science” is was absolutely hilarious. Kudos. I’m still laughing.

    Reply
  88. BobTheBody

    After reading through the comments section of this page I honestly, HONESTLY, believe that you and your friend Pat are trolls. However, I, unlike your god, am not infallible and thus could be wrong. If this is the case I have a couple of interesting points to put to you.

    Firstly, I assume you are aware of the amazing and undeniable similarities between your Christian god and the Egyptian god Horus? I’m going to pick out just a few similarities from the remarkable back-catalogue that exists to give to the other readers:

    1. Horus was baptized at age 30 by Anup the Baptiser at a river. Jesus was baptized at age 30 by John the Baptist at a river.

    2. Horus was killed by crucifixion. Jesus was also killed by crucifixion.

    3. Both were accompanied by 2 thieves at their respective crucifixions.

    4. Both were said to have been resurrected after a 3 day period, both, incidentally, were announced by 3 women.

    The list goes on, right from early childhood through to death, and even beyond. Now, given the existence of these similarities I myself have to question the validity of the Bible. Should the Christian god also be labelled ‘the great plagiariser’? I guess it’s not for me to decide.

    Anyway, on to my second point. I have in times past debated with many people about the existence of a creator, and one point seems to recur amongst the anointed of God (I use the term in the Christian sense). This is that they all KNOW that God exists. Most claim to have had a personal experience meaning that none can prove otherwise in their mind. More power to them I say! However, I must also note the truly amazing geographic divide between religions in the global sense. I often like to ask such such people if they would have had the same relgious enlightenment (note the irony of the term) if they were living in, for example, Pakistan, and had been raised as a strict Muslim. To this most blindly reply that they would, because they KNOW that their GOD exists. However, I myself remain sceptical (given the established conversion rates of strict Muslims to Christianity which remains remarkably low). You see, to me all this talk of whose god is real seems a little tiresome and ludicrous. If yours says the earth is 6,000 years old and that’s what you choose to believe then fine. But labelling others who choose to believe in the laws of common-sense, sorry, I should say science, as ‘heathens’ (as your friend did earlier)is not your prerogative. It might make those who believe in common-sense start to question your scruples.

    Sorry for the long post and I look forward to your replies – lol.

    Hail Thor.

    Reply
  89. Adam Nelson

    You’re making assumptions, not science.

    1) Have you personally traveled the 167,000 light years to see ground zero for the supposed explosion? I didn’t think so.

    2) We cannot even fly to the moon without much it being a huge endeavor. Are you trying to tell me scientists can confidently make predictions about the size, shape and nature of the universe. That is preposterous and presumptuous, and you’re trying to pass off your fairy tale under the guise of facts. Nice try, bucko.

    Reply
  90. Patrick.....Ireland

    Yes I am assuming that scientists know the speed of light and they know how to do the math. Its simple to measure and there are many way of doing it. You are assuming that a magic man made everything, so dont talk to me about assumptions….. Bucko.
    No creationist of the young earh variety can answer the question of how we have planets visible by the naked eye that we can prove are 2.4 million years old.

    Reply
  91. Patrick.....Ireland

    Typical response from the young earth creationist. Lost the arguement so changes the subject …………. to grammar.
    Here is what Edward D. Johnson, another modern expert, from this side of the Atlantic, says in The Handbook of Good English (N.Y.: Facts on File Publications, 1982. All page references are to this edition.): “Note that it is permissible to end a sentence with a preposition, despite a durable superstition that it is an error”.

    Of course you believe in superstition. Now an explanation please at to why there are stars and planets much much older than 6000 years.

    Reply
  92. Patrick.....Ireland

    I agree with you Bill. The bible says……..
    Psalms 58:10- The righteous shall rejoice when he seeth the vengeance: he shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked

    Proverbs 24:17- Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth:

    Both quotes come from the bible and both can not be true. To use the bible as “evidence” it must first of all agree with itself,

    Reply
  93. Pat Heinkel

    Actually, young man, science does have a doctrine. The worst doctrine of science is that of evolution, which more unscrupulous scientists will twist and turn facts of reality all about in order to try to make it work. Liberals allow students to become indoctrinated with this erroneous teaching, while letting only the myth religions to be taught at schools (they ban Christianity so all the silly religions can give the concept of religion a bad name). This confuses the minds of kids and indoctrinates them, which is very immoral and unfair. It’s an offense to truth.

    You’ll also notice that evolutionists hate a reasonable debate. I’ve forwarded several pieces on ChristWire from my Lies of Evolution lecture series, and to date the responses I’ve seen to counter those are very laughable at best. Evolutionists have no place to turn but attacks or running away when you confront them and call them on their bluff.

    Some professor wrote in with a paper and will be allowed to publish it here, and I’ll show again why these evolutionary lies are simply idiotic. Richard Dawkins, also, is scared to publicly debate me or try to contest my points. For a year now, I find he’s refused to engage me in any sort of public discussion because the truth that’s been allowed to set in my heart tears away the core of his beliefs. He’s naturally scared, just like all evolutionists. He’s scared of the unknown and has to cling to the cult of empiricism, and the Bible’s proof of how life, point-forward evolution and plasticity work truly scares the evolutionist’s misguided heart.

    Reply
  94. Patrick...Ireland

    I have also noted Adam that you have failed to answer my question on the stars that are more than 6000 years old. Reply to that post has also been blocked……..afraid of debate are we?

    Reply
  95. Patrick...Ireland

    You wont get any answer from them. it seems they like to shout “evidence” and “proof” and then run away and wont answer any questions.

    Reply
  96. Bill

    Science has never had any doctrine. Since the days of Copernicus it has always questioned the norms of society. For example, Copernicus theorized that the sun was the center of the galaxy. Kepler improved upon this suggesting the planets revolved in an elliptical way. Galileo further improved on theory by adding his years and years of data and observations via telescope. And this whole time these scientists were not only theorizing, but supporting those theories with rational data of the planet’s phases that they saw from their telescopes. They proved the church’s geocentric theory absolutely incorrect and their work was only made better by Newton and following scientists, always questioning things and being skeptics of how the world works. The same thing is happening with creationism vs evolutionist theory as what happened with helio-centric vs geo-centric theory, science will prove correct. Also, nobody indoctrinates students. If they so choose when they go to college, they can learn the science that has been accepted as legitimate. The reason creationism is not thought as a science, is because unlike regular science, it lacks evidence, peer-review, logical thinking based upon proving laws of physics and science, and so on. It is not science, but dogma. Christians want to perpetuate their religion which doesn’t try to better humanity, it seeks to keep their eyes closed by shunning it from the science that is backed by evidence, and contradicts the teachings of Christianity. I’m debating with you right now and I’m not shying away from your points whereas you are shying away from mine. I addressed everything in your post, in detail, whereas you only said how scientists are deluded, avoiding all my other points, without even offering a warrant for that outrageous claim. Who is really avoiding the debate here? Who is really scared?

    Reply
  97. Chris Christie

    If God created science, then he created evolution! I could create a cure for cancer without any proof it works. Does that mean my word that it’s the cure is all that’s needed? For all I know, my “Cure” could make things worse but because I say it works, then of course everyone should believe it works. And I don’t believe in God. Should I believe his word as true? Do YOU have proof God is real, as in a real being, not an “idea?” How can you prove God created Science? Did he tell you he created it? Did he tell anyone anything? Without actual proof that what happened in the bible actually happened, all I can see are a bunch of words

    Reply
  98. John

    Fossils?

    There is absolutely nothing to support the claims of evolution.
    Evolution is true to a certain extant, but it goes to a point were I have to draw the line.

    If there is give me a shred of proof.

    Reply
  99. John

    1 Corinthians 15:19
    If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.

    2 Timothy 3:12-13

    12Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.

    13But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.

    1 Timothy 1:12-14 (King James Version)

    12And I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who hath enabled me, for that he counted me faithful, putting me into the ministry;

    13Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.

    14And the grace of our Lord was exceeding abundant with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.

    John 15:19-21 (King James Version)

    19If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.

    20Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.

    21But all these things will they do unto you for my name’s sake, because they know not him that sent me.

    Matthew 5:11-12
    11Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.

    12Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you

    Romans 12:13-15 (King James Version)

    13Distributing to the necessity of saints; given to hospitality.

    14Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not.

    15Rejoice with them that do rejoice, and weep with them that weep.

    Romans 8:34-36 (King James Version)

    34Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.

    35Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?

    36As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.

    John 10:25-27 (King James Version)

    25Jesus answered them, I told you, and ye believed not: the works that I do in my Father’s name, they bear witness of me.

    26But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you.

    27My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:

    Repent and believe the gospel. Jesus died for you not religion.

    Reply
  100. John

    Talking about technology look what the Bible says.

    Daniel 12:4
    But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.

    Reply
  101. Adam Nelson

    The Bible method says “I Am” is all the proof you need. When someone asks why the Bible is true, you tell them God. I Am. God is the master of all, including science. His dictation have authority over all. So when the Bible says gay is caused by sin, guess what. Scientifically, the reason people choose to be gay is because of sin. Proof? Ask I Am. Ask God. If you don’t agree with him, too bad and I hope you don’t burn.

    Reply
  102. Claire

    Adam, I think that all that anal sex has impacted your bowels, which would explain why you have so much crap coming out of your mouth.

    Reply
  103. Zool

    To prove that the Bible is a fairy tale, it would have to contain at least one talking animal. That would be conclusive and definitive proof that the Bible is a fairy tale.

    Are there any talking animals in the Bible?

    The answer is a very obvious ‘yes’. There’s your proof.

    Also, just 2 simple questions to all you satan worshippers out there…
    Q. How can you tell that you’ve fallen for satan’s lies?
    A. You believe them.

    Q. How can you be ensure that you can be immune to satan’s lies?
    A. Question everything, believe nothing, see for yourself what the physical evidence shows. A fossil can’t lie. Man can.

    Faith is the best tool satan has at his disposal, and most people actually think they’re worshipping ‘good’!

    Hahaha, what fools.

    Reply
  104. matthewGee

    You dont understand what “Love” is, otherwise you wouldnt have made such an idiotic statement.

    Reply
  105. thinkforyourself

    so you believe in Unicorns then?
    The English word unicorn occurs nine times in the KJB, and is found in Numbers 23:22; 24:8; Deut. 33:17; Job 39:9,10; Psalms 22:21; 29:6; 92:10; and Isaiah 34:7.
    ———————- King James Bible

    Not to mention, The cockatrice or The satyr.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to so....? Cancel reply